WELCOME TO APEX TRENDSS PLC ( HIGHEST TRENDING)

NEWS | SPORTS | CELEBRITY GIST | MIXTAPE | COMEDY VIDEOS | JOKES | TECH | FASHION

PROMOTE MUSIC | ADVERTISE | SUBMIT FREEBEAT

PROMOTE YOUR MUSIC,BUSINESS ETC @ WHATSAPP 09019908422

  • OBSTACLES TO THE USE OF ICT IN HUMANITIES EDUCATION IN NIGERIA: TRANSFORMING PRACTICE FOR IMPROVED LEARNING

  • OBSTACLES TO THE USE OF ICT IN HUMANITIES EDUCATION  IN NIGERIA: TRANSFORMING PRACTICE FOR IMPROVED LEARNING

     DR. A.N MADUEKE
    Department of Arts & Social Science Education,
    Faculty of Education,
    University of Lagos, Nigeria
    E-mail: tmadux@yahoo.com 

    ABSTRACT
    The potential of Information Communication Technologies (ICT) in enhancing curriculum delivery in humanities education can only be realized when technologies have been well domesticated in institutions. This study therefore investigated the obstacles that hinder the domestication of ICTs in teaching and learning in humanities education using four Nigerian universities (University of Lagos, Lagos State University, University of Nigeria, Nsukka and Ebonyi State University) as a case study. A qualitative research method utilizing the questionnaire and an in-depth interview schedule were utilized in data sourcing.   Results show that though institutions and educators appreciate the benefits of ICTs in their teaching, there are a number of obstacles preventing the domestication of ICT in humanities education. Such barriers to the use of ICT in the four selected universities vary from one university to another. In Univ A, B, C and D for instance, power factor ranked first as the most inhibiting obstacle in an ascending order 2.9599, 2.9954, 3.1759, and 3.500, while attitudinal factors with the mean score of .9031, 1.2420, 1.5449, and 1.1.7215 ranked least among other barriers to the use of ICT.  Furthermore, it was noted that even in cases where technology is provided, educators are not effectively integrating such technologies in their pedagogical practices. Recommendations were made based on the findings.
    Key Words: Information and Communication, Domestication, Obstacles, Technology, Humanities Education,

    INTRODUCTION
    In today’s global economy and competitive environment, Information Communication Technology (ICT) is becoming a widely accepted tool for multi-faceted development in all fields. In view of the flexible services it offers, the new digital technologies offer the potential to revolutionize the traditional education system. There is the need to produce technologically literate workforce with positive disposition to technology use and reasonable competency of performing in a borderless knowledge based economy. According to UNESCO (2002) cited in Owhotu (2006), ICT is a term used to describe the tools and the processes  to access, retrieve, store, organize, manipulate, produce, present and exchange information by electronic and other automated means. These means include hardware, software and telecommunication in the form of personal computers, scanners, digital cameras, phones, faxes, modems, CD and DVD (digital view disc), players and records, digitalized video, radio and TV programmes and multimedia programs.

     Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been proven to be a very important aspect of teaching and learning process.  It plays a significant role in development efforts as they open up new opportunities for progress, the exchange of knowledge, education and training and for the promotion of creativity and intercultural dialogue. These technologies can also help to strengthen social cohesion and reinforce the capacity development for humanities education. Higham and Macaro (1993) conceptualize a broad outlook to gainful education that occurs through the medium of the Internet on both static and interactive websites. They indicate that some technologies related activities in humanities education include the use of:
    • Broadcast
    • Micro-computer with appropriate keyboards and other devices to teach literacy and writing
    • Keyboards, effects and sequencers in music teaching
    • Devices to facilitate communication for students with special needs
    • Electronic toys to develop spatial awareness and psycho-motor control
    • E-mail to support collaborative writing and sharing of resources
    • Video-conferencing to support teaching of modern foreign languages
    • Internet-based research to support geographical inquiry
    • Integrated learning systems (ILS) to teach basic literacy
    • Communication technology to exchange administrative and assessment data

    The experience of introducing different ICTs in humanities education classrooms and other educational settings all over the world over the past decades suggests that the full realization of the potential educational benefits of ICT is not automatic. Jung (2005) asserts that combining ICTs with effective pedagogy could be a daunting experience for some institutions since effective integration of ICTs into the educational system is a complex multi-faceted process that involves not just technology. He concludes that if it is not well adopted and domesticated in schools, educators may view the use of ICTs for curriculum delivery as an add-on and not as an integral part of teaching and learning. There is, therefore, the need to understand the barriers that affect the processes through which teachers integrate ICT in teaching to the point where technology becomes spontaneously domesticated into teaching and learning process in humanities classroom.

     ICTs in Nigerian Context
    Studies have examined the prospects of the use of ICTs especially in the application of computers to pedagogical work and practice in humanities education ( Umeh, 2000; Ruthven-Stuart, 2003; Maduekwe,2006; Tinio; 2007; Kwache,2007 ). ICT offers one of the greatest challenges of our time and organizations, especially educational institutions, have found its usage valuable.  Such advantages, that may accrue to both lecturers and students alike in  the use of ICT, range from providing lecturers with efficient and effective language tool (Maduekwe, 2006) taking care of students individual differences (Kwache, 2007) to making the lessons interesting, easier and more fun (Appoh, 2007) and provision of administrative support to lecturers (Anderson, 2004).

    Davis (2002) and Cronje and Conza (2002) contend that if universities are to compete in a global higher education development, they must embrace the technological advancements and use them as a strategic tool, capable of transforming educational practices. Such practices are achievable with technologically literate and critically thinking workforces who are prepared to participate fully in the global economics.  Highlighting the role of ICT in higher education, Yusuf (2005) confirmed that institutions across the world have been adopting ICT in an effort to create an environment for both learners and their instructors to engage in collaborative learning and gain access to information. Ololube (2006) added that access to information through ICT increases the information accessible to individuals. This will support them in trying new strategies, thinking and creativity that are reflective in practice aimed at engaging them to innovations through the use of ICTs. Akudolu (2004) is of the opinion that ICT devices and programmes can facilitate and enrich the quality of teaching and learning in humanities classroom in the areas of listening, speech work, reading and writing. However, to Jegede and Owolabi (2005) it appears that some of the ICT facilities are not sufficiently provided for teaching and learning processes. According to him, this is one of the reasons why some lecturers do not use some of the facilities in teaching.  

    In a study carried out by (Jegede & Adelolu, 2003; Bamidele,2006), it was concluded that the use of ICT facilities for teaching and learning (in humanities education) involves various methods which include systematized feedback system, computer – based operation network, video conferencing and audio conferencing, internet, compact disc (CD-ROM) and assisted instruction. Okebukola (2000) succinctly asserted that the effective use of the various methods of ICT in teaching will to a large extent depend on the availability of the ICT facilities and the teachers’ competence in using such. He opined that higher education institutions should not be influenced by features and functionality of software but rather focus on ICT as a tool to support teaching and learning. Besides, technology should not drive education; rather, educational goals and needs must drive technology.

    Recent changes in Higher Education have brought about a cultural shift and led to a review of and reflection about pedagogy (Rajesh, 2003). Part of this reflection centers on the move towards widening participation, addressing issues involved in accommodating greater numbers and a greater diversity of students into skill -oriented pedagogy. Ever increasing class sizes, modular frameworks, lifelong learning and an emphasis on skills development have been underpinned by the introduction of student-centered learning and an increasing use of the internet, computers, video, and other technology as a learning vehicle to deliver the educational experience. These changes are visible in subjects that make up the Humanities such as history, languages, and philosophy which involve the study of culture and ideas as distinct from the sciences. In fact, it is virtually impossible to escape the ICT in almost any facet of life, and humanities education is no exception. An advantage for teachers is the opportunity to use ICT to encourage and enable students to take responsibility, thus enhancing the ability to complete a task and deal with the issues involved in the process.

    Humanities Education and ICTs
    The term Humanities comes from a Latin word “humanus”, which means ‘human, cultured and refined. Currently, humanities is a loosely defined group of academic subjects united by a commitment to studying aspects of human condition and a qualitative approach that generally prevents a simple paradigm from coming to define any discipline. According Eastman (2007), the last two decades have witnessed a proliferation of computer technologies in humanities education. Unlike other subjects, it is not a group of scientific or technical subjects. The humanities are the stories, the ideas and the words that help us make sense of our lives and our world. Humanities education helps to introduce us to thoughts about life and what to do to make life better. By connecting us to other people, they point the way to answers about what is right and wrong or what is true to our heritage and history. The humanities help to address the challenges we face together in our families, our communities as a nation. As a field of study, humanities education emphasizes the analysis and exchange of ideas rather than the creative expression of the arts or the quantitative explanation of the sciences. The compendium of disciplines of the humanities includes:
    1. History, Anthropology and Archaeology, the study of human, social, political, and cultural development.
    2. Literature, Languages and Linguistics explore how we communicate with each other and how our ideas and thoughts on human experience are expressed and interpreted.
    3. Philosophy, Ethics, and Comparative Religion consider ideas about the meaning of life and the reasons for our thoughts and actions.
    4. Jurisprudence examines the values and principles which inform our laws.
    5. Historical, Critical, and Theoretical Approaches to the Arts reflect upon and analyze the creative process.
    6. History, Theory, and Criticism of the Arts
    7. Aspects of the Social Sciences Which Use Historical or Philosophical Approach.
    8. Humanities, General and Interdisciplinary.

    These academic disciplines or subjects deal with human values, perceptions, feelings, attitudes and the likes. The teaching of the humanities is intended to make students realize that the mere possession of knowledge is useless unless it is put to useful ends. Humanities education, therefore, is the instrument for helping the individual to build lasting societal and personal values, the knowledge and skills needed to become productive and responsible members of the society. In humanities education, thus, we see the development of the whole person, which is the goal of present day education. A humanist is one who is able to think critically, solve problems, take rational decisions and contribute meaningfully to society.

    There is, at present, a groundswell of interest in how computers and the internet can best be harnessed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Humanities education at all levels. Some of the major activities and characteristics of humanities are participation in debates, discussions, reading, independent study, critical thinking and research. It is evident that ICT- enhanced learning encourages learner participation and cooperation among students, promotes team spirit, critical thinking and enhances global awareness and much desired communicative skills. Since the four language skills have an important place in humanities education, adult learner’s as much as young students can build their communication and interpersonal skills as they use ICT tools to speak, discuss, respond to questions, listen to speeches etc. The preparation and delivery during such activities can help in fostering critical thinking, self confidence and assurance in addition to comprehension skills.

    These methods could be supported with such tools as films, slides, video clips, projectors, e-mail, discussion forum, DVD and television programmes. Technology profoundly affects learning and teaching in the humanities as well as the nature of humanities. In most cases as well, traditional materials such as the textbook and chalkboard, and technology such as laboratory equipment, radio, film, projectors and computers have been used to support classroom teaching. All in all, the use of technology   to support classroom teaching does not radically change the teaching method. Rather, the teacher remains the key player in determining which, when, where and how to integrate these learning technologies in the humanities classroom.

    Theoretical Underpinning and Assumptions: Theory of Domestication
    The theoretical underpinning for this present study is based on the theory of Domestication as propounded by (Chigona, Chigona, Kayonago, and Kausa,2010; Alampay, 2006; Frissen, 2000; and Pelgrum,2001). The definitions of these terms are outlined below.




    Domestication Paradigm
    According to them, domestication is described as the process of technology adoption into everyday life.  The framework looks beyond the adoption and use of ICTs (as well as gratifications or benefits) to ask what the technologies and services mean to people, how they experience them and the roles that these technologies can come to play in their lives. The processes observed in this framework are concerned with how individuals encounter technologies and deal with them, sometimes rejecting them and at other times accepting them (Rogers, 2003).

    The domestication paradigm was devised by Chigona, Chigona, Kayonago, and Kausa (2010). According to them, domestication consists of three main processes namely: Commodification, Appropriation and Conversation.  Some researchers split the appropriation stage into Objectification and Incorporation stages, thus making four stages (Frissen, 2000). This study adopted the four stage process of domestication. Commodification refers to the way a technological product is designed and is given an image by the users as it emerges into the public space. At this stage, symbolic and functional claims about the product are noted. The product is evaluated on how well it would satisfy the teachers’ perceived needs (Warschauer, 2004). In the case where the teachers have the choice of adopting, the commodification process may affect his/her decision to acquire the product. Once purchased by an individual or an organization, the product or object goes through a process of appropriation.  At this stage the product is possessed by the owner and becomes authentic. When looking at appropriation, the objectification process is considered to examine how the product finds space and enters the geographical area of the owners. Objectification does not necessarily mean the product is accepted by the potential adopters. Product is then incorporated into the daily routines of its owners. Incorporation begins by first integrating the product in temporal structures both formally (in the work schedules) and informally (in the routines and habits).

    In the conversion stage, the adopters of the innovation show their adopting by displaying it to the outside world physically or symbolically (Habib, 2004). In case of ICT for curriculum delivery, the display could be by individual teachers within a school environment or by the entire school as an adopter displaying to other schools. The first two stages of the domestication process are equivalent to what is normally referred to as adoption in most adoption frameworks (Pedersen & Ling, 2003). Thus, it is noted that the domestication framework allows for investigating the processes beyond the acquisition of the technology. The domestication framework has been used to study the adoption processes of a variety of technologies including personal computers, televisions and mobile phones (Perdersen & Ling, 2003). Again it should be noted that although the framework is mainly used to study person or household adoption of technology, others recommend that it can also be used to study organizational domestication of technology. In this paper, we employed the domestication framework as the lens to understand the perceived obstacles impinging on domesticating ICTs in the pedagogy of Humanities Education in Nigerian Universities.

    Research Problem
     There is an urgency regarding the improvement of the quality of Humanities education.  ICT is perceived as a necessary tool for this purpose. Adeoye (2009) noted that ICT requires teachers to be committed to a constant and changing learning curve which may involve a mixture of formal and less formal technique if they are to acquire and develop the skills needed to be an effective ICT user. However, he lamented that many university lecturers still find it difficult to be potential ICT users given the difficulties they face.  In support of this notion, Webber (2003) noted that globally, there are major obstacles to the domestication of ICT in humanity education which cut across all levels worldwide and is still not well addressed.  The urgency of action in this regard has become even more imperative considering the impact of globalization and the rapidly expanding role of knowledge, information and communication technology and the interface between education society, economy, culture and technology (UNESCO Draft Programme and Budget 2002-2003).


    Purpose of the Study
    This study therefore sought to determine the perceived obstacles to the use of ICT in humanities education. Secondly, the study aims at establishing if the obstacles involved vary in different universities.

    Research Questions
    To achieve the objective of this study, the following research questions were posited:
    1.                  To what extent does health, psychology, power, socio-economic, training, attitude, cultural, political, personal, economic and technical factors militate against lecturers’ use of ICT in teaching at the sampled universities in Nigeria?
    2.                  Do these obstacles/ barriers vary from one university to the other?

    Method
    Design
    The study adopted a descriptive survey research design to find out the obstacles to the domestication of ICT in Nigerian universities.

    Participants
    The participants in this study were lecturers from four Nigerian universities, two from the South Western Nigeria and two from the South Eastern Nigeria. These universities are: University of Lagos, Akoka, (Univ A), Lagos State University, Ojo (Univ B), University of Nigeria, Nsukka (Univ C), and Ebonyi State University, Ebonyi (Univ D) which are randomly selected from South-West and South-Eastern States of Nigeria. We shall be referring to these universities as University A, B, C, and D. Lecturers were selected from the various faculties in these universities via a simple random sampling technique. Sixty lecturers were sampled in each university giving a total of two hundred and forty (240) respondents.

    Instruments
    The Questionnaire
    The major instrument employed in collecting the data for this study was an open type questionnaire supplanted with unstructured interview session. The questionnaire comprised 20 items and each item was structured on a five point Likert scale ranging from a score of 1 to 5, with 1 = strongly disagree and 4= strongly agree. Two lecturers of computer technology and two Humanity Education Unit lecturers scrutinized the items of the scale to ascertain the content validity. Their observations and comments were given due consideration hence the number of items was reduced from fifty two to forty- nine before the final draft. Using the test- re-test procedure, the final draft of the questionnaire was pilot tested on a group of lecturers (N= 25) teaching in one of the nearby university but not within the schools selected for the study. The Cronbach coefficient alpha of the instrument obtained was of 0.768 and was considered adequate for the study.

    Data Analysis
    The study utilized descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, reliability tests and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

    RESULTS
    The results of the data analysis indicating the mean of all variables hindering the domestication of ICT in Humanities education are shown on Table 1.

    Research Question 1: To what extent does health, psychological, power, socio-economic, training, attitude, cultural, political, personal, economic and technical factors militate against lecturers’ use of ICT in teaching at the universities?
    To analyse the research question above, Arithmetic mean was used after rating each response on a 5-point basis. Results are stated in Table 1.








    Table 1: Respondents views on Factors Militating Against Use of ICT By University Lecturers.
    Factors / Barriers
    Mean of Responses
    Ranking of Barriers
    Electricity (Power)
    Economic
    Political
    Socio-economic
    Health
    Training
    Personal
    Psychological
    Culture
    Attitude
    Technical




    3.158
    2.815
    2.507
    2.255
    2.248
    2.125
    2.094
    1.866
    1.460
    1.353
    Technical
    1st
    2nd
    3rd
    4th
    5th
    6th
    7th
    9th
    10th
    11th
    8th




    Table 1 above showed 11 factors that are militating against lecturers’ use of ICT in the universities and indicated the degree of seriousness of the barriers. The most disturbing factor is irregular power supply which pooled the highest mean score (3.158) out of a maximum of 5. This translates to over 63% of the respondents complaining about this factor. The next serious factor is economic which pooled or recorded 2.815 as mean score that translates to over 56% of the respondents. Other factors have different degrees of seriousness in militating against lecturers’ use of ICT in teaching included socio-economic= 2.255, health= 2.248, training=2.125, personal=2.092 and attitude ( = 1.353), culture (= 1.460) and psychological ( = 1.866) which do not have any serious effect on lecturers’ use of ICT in the universities.

















    Research Question 2  Do the factors / barriers vary from one university to another?





    Table 2: The Mean Average factors militating lecturers’ use of ICT for Teaching in different universities.
    FACTORS
    UNILAG
    (UNIV. A)
    LASU (UNIV.B)
    EBSU
    (UNIV.C)
    UNN
    (UNIV.D)
    Health
    2.1944
    2.1298
    2.5529
    2.1142
    Psychological
    1.1620
    1.8846
    2.7115
    1.7068
    Power
    3.1759
    2.9599
    3.5000
    2.9954
    Socio-economic
    2.1528
    2.2548
    2.5577
    2.0556
    Training
    2.5231
    2.1795
    1.6442
    2.1528
    Attitude
    .9031
    1.5449
    1.7215
    1.2420
    Culture
    1.1194
    1.8192
    1.4567
    1.4444
    Political
    2.1093
    2.0740
    3.2315
    2.0926
    Personal
    1.6562
    2.2660
    2.5147
    1.9401
    Economic
    2.3951
    2.6603
    3.4551
    2.7500
    Technical
    1.6204
    2.2067
    2.9471
    1.5833

    Table 2 showed the Arithmetic mean scores of the ratings of the factors militating against lecturers’ use of ICT for teaching in different universities. Table 2 showed that power is a dominant factor militating against lecturers’ use of ICT in all the four universities as it ranked first in each of the universities. The degree or level the other factors affect lecturers’ use of ICT vary from one university to another. For instance, in Univ.A the second serious factor is Training (2.5231), in Univ.B it is Economic (2.6603), in Univ.C is also Economic (3.4551) while in Univ.D it is also Economic (2.75). It implies that while the lecturers in the other 3 universities see Economic is an issue, at Univ.A, training is more of an issue than Economic. The least important factor to lecturers’ non-use of ICT at Univ.A, Univ.B, and Univ.D is attitude while in Univ.C it is culture. Table 2 also showed that technical (   = 2.9471) and psychological (2.7115) factors are considered as serious obstacle to lecturers at Univ.C, they are not to lecturers in Univ.A and Univ.D.

    In summary, by examining the means collectively for all factors per university, it was observed that factors that have the greatest effect on lecturers are found at Univ.C followed by Univ.B, then Univ.A and Univ.D.


    DISCUSSION
    This study investigated the nature of barriers hindering the domestication of ICT in Humanities Education Unit in Nigerian Universities. The results revealed that four major variables: power, economic, political and socio-economic factors ranked highest and combined among the obstacles affecting lecturers’ domestication of ICT in Humanities education. However, other factors are slightly significant. It is evidently clear that in the four universities, Univ. A, B C and D, the power factor ranked first as the most inhibiting obstacle in ascending order (3.158), economic (2.815), political (2.507), and socio-economic (2.255), while other factors have different degrees of seriousness in militating against lecturers’ use of ICT with attitude,(=1.353), culture,(=1.460), and psychological, (=1.866) ranking least among the obstacles to the use of ICT in the sampled universities. Furthermore, the findings of the study indicate that epileptic power supply is a major hindrance to lecturers’ use of ICT with the highest mean score of 3.158 out of a maximum of 5. This research finding is in consonance with earlier  studies  of Ushie, Beshel, Asanga and Inyang, 2008; Akudolu, 2002; Adomi, 2005; Osondu, 2006 who asserted that erratic power supply by Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN)  is a major constraint to the use of ICT such that where the facilities are available, use is impossible. Busari (2006) also confirmed that a stable power supply reshapes a nation’s economy and mentality towards ICT positively.

    The results about the economic and socio-economic obstacles which pooled 2.815 and 2.255 as mean scores are respectively significantly and potent one of the reasons that often dictate  lecturers attitude towards  acceptance, acquisition of knowledge and skills, integration and effective diffusion and domestication of computer technology in Humanity classrooms. Implicitly, the economic and social-economic context of the institutions also affects the ICT adoption.  In an affluent setting like University A, many lecturers have access to computers and Internet at home and therefore are confident with the use of technology within the school environment. In contrast, many in institutions in disadvantaged areas do not have constant power supply let alone of ICT amenities at home and therefore are less familiar with their use. Such lecturers have low propensity to the use of computers. This finding is in consonance with Owhotu (2009) who noted that many states in Nigeria especially, but not exclusively, the northern states, with low education indicators, are trying to expand the system at the same time as improving the quality and outcomes of the institutions. In these settings, the ICT output is low and the demand for skilled graduates is high. Salawu (2002) found that government policies as well do not make provision for adequate funds for procuring ICT infrastructures in higher institutions. Hence lecturers, who see themselves as being computer competent and confident, are favorably disposed to independent self sponsorship.

    Linked to this is the problem of limited resources which negatively affects the domestication of technology. Most of the institutions sampled suffer high student ratio which has discouraged some lecturers from incorporating ICT in their teaching and learning. This finding corroborates Udeani’s (2006) assertion that adequate equipment, connection cost and population of students are generally excessive barriers for developing countries in Africa, South Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Another major outcome of this study is the issue of health variable which recorded a mean score of 2.248 as a serious contributory obstacle. This outcome indicated that despite the re-assuring measures taken by some institutions, some lecturers have attributed various health problems to visual strain, frontal head ache, mental fatigue, ruptured eye vessels, swollen hands and fingers. This finding coincides with previous findings by (Baylor & Ritche 2002; Namlu & Ceyhan, 2002; Deniz, 2007) who posited that headache, muscle strain, skin allergies and eye damage are all too common health hazard to prolonged computer use.

    The result of this study further revealed that politics significantly served as obstacle to the diffusion of Information Communication Technologies with a mean score of 2.507.  By implication, we observe that contextually different environments bring about different challenges in implementation and utilization of ICT within pedagogical practice. For instance, in some states, the ICT policy may not augur well with some institutions.  In some institutions where there is a top-down management style  with little consultation between levels, staff members  may feel coerced into using ICT and therefore may not use it effectively (Czerniewicz & Brown, 2009). Lecturers may feel constrained by lack of institutional support and political will and may feel unsure of the direction they may take and the purpose the use of ICT is meant to serve. Furthermore, research has confirmed that institutional politics, vision and leadership provided in well managed institutions enable lecturers to use ICTs more productively than their counterparts in institutions which are not well politically managed (Czerniewicz & Brown, 2009).

    Findings of this study show that lack of adequate training is equally emphasized as a 6th serious barrier for lecturers to be good users of ICT. The study also revealed that most lecturers prefer the traditional method of teaching which is the ‘chalk-talk’ method to teaching using ICT. This finding is in line with the argument of Ikoro (2002), who stated clearly that lecturers are so used to the traditional method of teaching and therefore see the introduction of ICT as time consuming and sometimes unnecessary. In support of this notion, Auala, (2003) and Owhotu (2009) noted that institutions of higher learning in Nigeria have not taken up the challenge to professionally train their lecturers in ICT use which is responsible for the latters’ indifferent attitude to the use of ICT. The professional development of lecturers sits at the heart of any successful technology and education programme as (Baylor and Ritchie, 2002; Sofoluwe & Badmus, 2004) conclude that professional development has a significant influence on how well ICT is embraced in the classroom.  

    Surprisingly, attitude, culture and psychology as variables did not contribute much to the obstacles towards the domestication of computer technologies with a mean score of 1.353, 1.460 and 1.866 respectively. The reason for this is not far-fetched because teachers may have the right attitude but once the right support  and infrastructure such as physical space, furniture, electricity and internet connectivity are not available  it might be difficult to benefit from technology. This outcome thus negates previous research by Nwagwu (2006) who noted that if lecturers want to successfully adopt the use of technologies in their lectures, they must possess positive attitudes. An important factor in the implementation of ICT is the users’ acceptance which in turn is influenced by their attributes and attitudes towards the media.
      
     RECOMMENDATIONS

    1.                  In order to revamp the Humanity Education system, there is need to produce a technologically literate workforce who are competent to rise up to the challenges of technological innovations. ICT must be given necessary attention by institutions to ensure it is integrated and domesticated into our educational system.

    2.                  Effective use of the various methods of ICT in Humanity Education will invariably depend on the availability of the ICT facilities and the teachers’ competence in using such. Government at various levels should therefore equip teachers with the necessary tools such as computers, computer laboratories, laptops and technical assistance that would enhance their computer literacy. Since frequent use of computers is an antidote for computer anxiety, Humanities Education should ensure their laboratories are internet networked so as to encourage more teachers’ access to computer technologies for the present and future use.

    3.                  Teachers’ professional development is a lifelong phenomenon. Like any other reform effort, the use of technologies cannot be achieved by one shot training course. As technology is changing very fast, teachers need to be upgraded with these changes in order to get positive results in Humanities Education.

    Although Humanity Education programmes do not typically include technology training, it is now quite obvious that interactive and communication technology training needs to be compulsorily incorporated into the pedagogy to achieve the greatest educational impact and domestication.

    CONCLUSION

    This study has shown that despite the willingness of lecturers to integrate  ICT in their teaching and learning process, variables like power, economic, political, training and health issues in institutions make it difficult for a firm ground to be established for the domestication of ICTs’ in Humanities Education in the sampled universities.  This implies that in reality, access does not equate to effective usage and the achievement of the desired impact. The proliferation of technologies has complicated the teaching learning process and finding show that the best ways of integrating technology into classroom practices is one of the challenges the 21st century teachers face. Moreover, integrating and domesticating ICT into humanities education is much more complicated because of the different perspectives of the compendium of subjects and disciplines involved.

    In this respect, teachers as sole implementers are expected to have knowledge, skills and positive attitudes towards the implementation of ICT in institutions of higher learning. We need to acknowledge that the success of implementation is more serious than just providing computers and securing a connection to the internet. According to Fullan (1991) the process of change implementation is planned along three stages, namely: adoption, implementation and institutionalization. Consequently, an awareness of any obstacle that teachers face could lead to the development of solutions to overcoming these obstacles, develop useful training programmes and encourage the use of ICT.

     Overall, no single solution exists to address the immense challenges of ICT domestication in a second language context. Perhaps, both teachers and trainees require an ongoing support and opportunities to experiment with ICT skills and strategies in a pedagogically innovation perspectives. Postman (1993) asserted that in our technicalized, present-centered information environment, it is not easy to locate a rationale for education, let alone impart ICT convincingly. To achieve the goal of humanity education, we need teachers and students who will understand the relationships between techno and our social and psychic worlds, so that they may begin informed conversations about where technology is taking us (Warschauer, 2003). This does not mean that ICT should replace the traditional method of teaching. Rather, effective domestication of ICT into the traditional method in the humanities will make for more balanced pedagogical outcomes.




















    REFERENCES

    Adomi, E. E. (2005) Internet development and connectively in Nigeria. Retrieved
                28/01/2009 from:   

    Akudolu, L. R. (2002) Information and communication technology (ICT) centered
              education: A necessity for national development. Nigeria Journal of Computer
              Literacy (NJCL) vol. 3, pp. 12.

    Akudolu, L. R. (2004). Teaching the language arts. Enugu: John Jacobs’ Publishing.

    Akudolu, L. R. I (2004) Comparative analysis of the effects of computer assisted
              language learning (CALL) and conventional French instruction (CFI) on
              students’ performance in French Language. An International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (December,
             2004) Volume 1, No.1 and 2

    Adomi, E. E. (2005). Internet development and connectivity in Nigeria. Retrieved
             28/01/2009 from:
      

    Alampay, E. A. (2006). Beyond access to ICTs: Measuring capabilities in the
             information society. International Journal of Education and Development using
             Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 4-22.

    Appoh, J. (2007) Integrating technology into the process of teaching and learning.
             Journal of Research and Development in Education (JORDE) 7, 129-135.

    Badmos, A. M. (2004). Computer instruction: An approach that expedites the system
             of education. NJCL. vol. 5, no. 1, pp 21-29.

    Bates, T. (2001) National Strategies for e-learning in post – secondary education and
           training, Paris: UNESCO.

    Baylor A. Ritche D, (2002). What factor facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale and
            perceived student learning in technology using classrooms? Computers &
            Education, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 395 – 414.

    Busari, Temi O. (2006). Information and communication technology in science and
            technology education. In V. B. Owhotu (ed.). An Introduction to Information
            Technologies in Education . Lagos: Sibon publishers. pp. 101 – 103.

    Chigona, A. Chigona, W. & Davis, Z. (2010). Motivating factors: Educators’ use of
            ICT in schools in disadvantaged areas in the Western Cape. International
            Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, University of Cape Town,
            Cape Town.

    Collins, B. (2002) Information Technologies for education and training. In
           Adelsberger, H., Collis, B and Pawlowski, J. (eds) Handbook on Technologies   
           for Information and Training. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Cronje and Conza (2002). Computers for Africa: Lessons learnt from introducing
            computers in schools in Mozambique. Available at

    Czerniewicz L. & Brown, C.  (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional
            policy, organizational culture and e-learning use in four South African
            Universities. Computers & Education.  53 (1), pp. 121-131.

    Deniz, L. (2007). Prospective class teachers’ computer experience and computer
            attitudes.  International Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 116-122.

    Eastman, J. (2007). Enhancing classroom communication with interactive technology:
           How faculty can get started. Journal of College teaching methods & styles, vol. 3,
           no. 1, pp. 31-37.

    Frissen, V. A. J. (2000). ICTs in the rush hour of life. The Information Society  16(2000)
           65-75.
    Fullan, M. (1992). Successful School Improvement: The Implementation perspective
          and Beyond. Open University Press, Philadelphia, USA.

    Ikoro, F. M. (2002). Information sources for effective teaching and learning in
           Nigerian Languages. Language Librarianship 1(2), 21 – 29.

    International journal of Instruction. January 2009 edition, volume 2.

    Jegede, D. O. & Adelodun, O. A. (2003) The status of computer education in Nigeria
           secondary schools: The African symposium, 3(3) 1-4. Retrieved July 10, 2004

    Jegede, P. O. & Owolabi, J. (2005). Effects of professional status, subject discipline
           and computer access on computer attitudes among teacher educators in Nigeria
           colleges of education. Information Technology Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158-162.

    Jung, I. (2005). ICT – Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application cases  
           worldwide. Educational Technology and Society 2(3), pp. 387-394.

    Kwache, P. Z. (2007) The imperatives of information and communication technology
             for teachers in Nigeria higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
            Testing (JOLT).  Available from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol.3no4kwache.htm.
            Accessed 30/03/2009.
      
    Maduekwe, A. N. (2006) Perspectives on teacher education and ICTs in  
              language classroom. In V. B. Owhotu (ed.) An Introduction to Information  
              Technologies in Education. Lagos: Sibon Books Ltd.

    Majasan, B. U. (2003) Towards a focus on ICT. Ibadan: Technology in Nigeria: Revolution or Evolution. Retrieved from:

    Namlu, A. & Ceyhan, E. (2002). Computer anxiety: A study on university students.
            Eskrsehir: Eskrsehir University Publishing,

    Nwagwu. W. (2006) Integrating ICT into the globalization of the poor developing
              countries. Information Development, 22(3), 167-179.

    Okebukola, (2000) Teachers advised to acquire computer education. The Guardian
            Newspaper. Thursday, August 14, 2000, pp. 36.

    Oliver, R & Towers, S. (2000). Benchmarking ICT literacy in tertiary learning
            settings. In Rasims, M. O’ Reilly & S. Sawkins (eds) Learning to Choose:
            Choosing to learn. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp
            381-390) Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University Press.

    Otunla, A. (2005). Information and communication media in education and health
            sciences: Techniques, production and presentation Lagos: Joslam Ltd Nigeria  
            Enterprise.

    Owhotu, V. B. (2006). An Introduction to information technologies in education.
              In V. B. Owhotu (ed.) An Introduction to Information Technologies in
             Education..Lagos: Sibon Books Ltd.

    Owhotu, V.B.  (2009). Goals, challenges and prospects of UNESCO teacher training
            initiative in Sub-Saharan Africa. In V. B. Owhotu (ed.) Innovation and Best
            Practices in Teacher Education. pp. 35

    Oyewo, O. T. (2008). The place of technology in education: Policy, organizational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities.  Computers and Education Lagos: Logan Publishers,  53(1) pp.39.
              121-131.

    Pedersen, P. and Ling, R. (2003). Modifying adoption research for mobile internet
            service adoption,: Cross disciplinary interactions, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii
            International Conference on System Sciences.

    Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in Education: Results from a
           worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education 37(2) 163-178.

    Postman Neil (1993) Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage
           Books: New York 198, 186.

    Rajesh, M. (2003) The study of the problems associate with ICT adaptability in
           developing countries in the context of distance education. Turkish Online Journal
           of Distance Education (TOJDE),  4(2).

    Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Ruthven – Stuart, P. (2003) Integrating ICT into a university language curriculum:
            Can it be done successfully?  Hokuriku:Bulletin of Hokuriku University, 27, 159-176.

    Salawu, I. O. (2002) Towards effective integration of ICT into teacher education  
           curriculum in Nigeria, Nigeria Journal of Computer Literacy (NJCL)  vol. 3, pp. 73.

    Stephen, J (ed) (2001)Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies.
           London, Kogan publishers.

    Tinio, V. I. (2007) ICTS in education: Changes in integrating ICTs in education. Available at http://en.wikibooks.org/key Accessed 25/02/09.

    Udeani, Uchenna (2006) Gender and information and communication technology
             in education. In V. B. Owhotu. An Introduction to Information Technologies in
             Education. Lagos:Sibon Publishers. pp. 205 -208.

    Ushe, Beshel, C., Asanga D. and Inyang, J. (2008 ). Academic staff use of internet in
            federal colleges of education in middle – Belt Nigeria. In Biodun Akinpelu 
            (Ed) Nigeria Association for Educational Media and Technology (NAEMT)
            Conference Proceedings. LASU.

    Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital
            divide. Cambridge; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English
             language teaching: TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511 – 535.

    Webber, C. (2003) Introducing new technologies and educative leadership. Journal of
            Educational Administration 4(22), 119 – 123.

    Yusuf, M. (2005) Information communication technology and education: Analyzing
           the Nigerian national policy for information technology. International Education
           Journal  6(3), 316-321.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment